Kazhes pierakstu burtnīca

Nesaprotu, kā tas atgadījās, ka manā faktoīdā trūkst ieraksta šim Verbēra romānam, tagad šo situāciju ņemos labot.

Luiss Ārmstrongs! Kopā ar Ellu Fitcdžeraldu! Izpilda Džordža Geršvina "Porgiju un Besu"! Fenomenāli! Vai ne?

When I went to my favourite "Goethe" library I took 3 books with me to read at home, like I always do. What I didn`t know then was that more than 50% of those books were written by Jews, about Jews and about Holocaust. If it were not the case I`d probably choose a subject more merry than this one. By the way, I haven`t even looked at the third book yet, so theoretically a chance exists that it`s also about Holocaust. I hope it isn`t. But to be sure I`ll check it just now. Hoorray! No Jews mentioned! Now that`s a good thing. Still "The Boxer" ain`t no half-bad book. Jurek Becker is surely one of the most interesting personalities among the German speaking writers whom I`ve discovered by going to this library. This is a story of a guy named Aron Blank who`s family hasn`t survived the holocaust, but he has. After the war he finds one of his children who happens to be also alive, although after years in a concentration camp he doesn`t know anything about anything. Still Aron manages to put his life back on the trail and to survive in the modern world. I can`t say that I liked this book because of the content, for there was little likeable in it, but Becker`s writing style is such that you just can`t dislike it. Even when writing about the most grieve subject he never ever goes overboard and stays normal - which is a rare case for subjects like the Holocaust.

Stāsts par to, kā es atguvu savu "Autostopa Visumā rokasgrāmatu", pats būtu spējīgs pārvērsties par romānu. Notikumu tur gan nebija daudz, bet laika gan. Īsā versija bija šāda - es grāmatu aizdevu kādai kolēģei, pēc pusgada nomainīju darbavietu, palūdzu, lai šī bijusī kolēģe šo grāmatu atdod Sīcim, vēl trīs mēnešus vēlāk pajautāju Sīcim, vai viņš var no šīs kolēģes to grāmatu dabūt, uzzināju, ka tā jau vairākus mēnešus atrodas Sīča plauktā, kur es to būtu varējis pat ieraudzīt. Dabūju grāmatu. Aizmirsu to pie N&N. Visubeidzot tā atgriezās pie manis.

"Sirēnas" ir viena no agrīnajām angļu smukulīša Hjū Grānta filmām. Dīvaini gan ir tas, ka šis smukulītis pat šajā filmā ir jau 34-gadīgs un ka pirms 30 gadu vecuma sasniegšanas viņš vispār nebija nekāds populārs smukulītis.

It`s been a many long year since I read this book (at the moment of the writing that is), because this is one of the pieces that came into the zone of no return when my computer crashed last summer. The date of reading is probably wrong as well, but I don`t really care for that. This is a story of a long time communist named Aglaya Revkina that is a fan of Mr. Stalin and even organized a monument of his in the little village where she lived (or was it a small town? i don`t care that much about it) and when Stalin became unpopular she even held the monument in her own apartmenet. There was also some guy who did some blowing up for local criminals in modern (post-soviet) Russia who lived in the same house with Aglaya, then there were some modern stalinists that started visiting Aglaya, to be honest, that`s the most of what I remember from this book. Also I remember that the first part was somewhat interesting, but as we were heading towards the conclusion the book became less and less appealing to me - and Mr. Voinovich became more and more traditional in the sense that many modern Russian writers do the same gangster-criminal style, although I did get that his main target probably was showing that a criminal is worse than a communist, for a communist at least has some ideals, still most communists are criminals and have no ideals (yeah, there were some scenes with people that at first glorified Stalin, than spat at him and the glorified him once again). Not to mention that the only time in her life when Aglaya had an orgasm was by looking at the father of the Soviet Union in person.

I was a little boy when I read this book first. At that time reading in Russian was to me something similar to what reading in English is today but I managed to read the entire 7 book "Narnia" series which I got circa 1994 on Crimea. As you can probably guess I didn`t have much interest in these books after that for quite a while - and why would I. The first time I really remembered of Lewis was when the first film part of "Lord of the Rings" came out and then I thought - why wouldn`t they make a film after "Narnia" as well. Then something like year or so ago I watched a TV version of "Prince Caspian" which sucked big hairy... bears. And now when I intended to watch the first of the "Narnia" films on the big screen I thought it a good idea to reread this part of the book. As a matter of fact, todays, more than two weeks after the repeated reading I still haven`t seen the film. Maybe I will see it before 2005 ends, maybe I won`t, it still won`t change much. The book itself is a story about four children travelling through a wardrobe into a fantastic land where they have to fight the evil within themselves and a white witch. As a whole the book is too targeted for children and has a bit too much religious nonsense - it`s just like a kids bible with the crucifixion and resurrection of the lion. Although I still stay with my words that "Lord of the Rings" isn`t a book for adults, I have to admit that "Narnia" is intended for a much younger audience - its modern day equivalent would be Harry Potter. The storytelling is so preacherous that I can`t really enjoy this book. And what I hate most than all is that only because of having been written first this is also considered the first book of the series. I proudly stand as a supporter of "The Magician`s Nephew" as the first book (and it is certainly a much better written novel than the one about the wardrobe). If I had to order the books according to their quality it would probably go like this:

Interesanti - pirms pirmo reizi šo ierakstu klausījos, es no tā negaidīju neko. Pēc tam, kad noklausījos pirmo dziesmu, gaidīju no atlikušā albūma ļoti daudz. Beigās paliku kaut kur pa vidu.

Pats Vonnegūts "Čempionu brokastis" neuzskatīja par vienu no saviem labākajiem darbiem. Noteikti viņš to uzskatīja par vienu no nekaunīgākajiem saviem darbiem, tas gan. Kur citur tu vēl grāmatā redzēsi Vonnegūta zīmējumu, kas atveido dibena caurumu? Kur vēl citure par katru vīriešu dzimuma personāžu autors atklās viņa peņa garumu un diametru? Kur citur vēl būs paskaidrota atšķirība starp paplestu "beaver" un kokus grauzošu beaver?

The Hollies are virtually unknown in Latvia but it isn`t neither an advantage nor a disadvantage. Among the bands of the British invasion the Hollies don`t stand out as one with a particulary heavy sound. Oh, now, you won`t hear Graham Nash shouting that he can`t get no satisfaction. As for myself I`m not sure whether I prefer bands with a harder or with a softer sound. Probably it differs according to the mood I`m in at the moment of listening to a record. Today "The Hollies" sound perfectly adequate but I`m not raving mad for their poppy sound. "For Certain Because" is certainly my favourite of their records because there`s a lot of pretty songs on it. Examples include "What`s Wrong With The Way I Live", "Tell Me To My Face", "Stop! Stop! Stop!" But the most perfect song on here is "High Classed". It`s just so moody that I can`t find the right words to explain just how much I like it. The melody may be quite a simple one but I don`t give a damn about that. "Peculiar Situation" is a bit too sappy for my taste, although it has a nice chorus. "Ain`t this a peculiar situation? We`re lovers but we don`t make love." Another nice song is "What Went Wrong". Basically this album has amazing vocals, provided mostly by Nash, and a lot of uplifting lightweight bubblegum. "The Hollies" never made a revolution in music, they were never groundbreaking but they surely knew how to make a good album, despite being a bit too sacharine like for me (at worst they are close to "Mannfred Mann". As a matter of fact I like MM some time ago - not Manson but Mann, of course - but listening to their 60s songs is a terrible experience for my ears now).