Kazhes pierakstu burtnīca

After having read "The Mansion" I found myself really interested in Faulkner`s work. But "Intruder in the dust" proved to be such a demanding read that I couldn`t convince myself in it being interesting. No, not that it wasn`t interesting, it was written in a style too complicated for me. And, if you want to know, I read it in my native Latvian language, not in English. The story is quite simple - a black man is blamed for shooting a white man in the back but it wasn`t him really. His only chance is that of two teenagers and an elderly woman digging the corpse from the grave and proving that it wasn`t killed by the black man`s gun. In terms of the story "Intruder" reminds me of some Mark Twain`s work (something quite like "Tom Sawyer" in style). But there`s a major difference between Twain and his follower, Faulkner. Faulkner writes in such a manner that his book doesn`t flow too simply, it`s much like some of Joyce`s or Prouste`s work - you get a very simple story done with so much reflections and in a crazy grammatical style that you can`t get the story as easy as you`d probably want to. It`s pretentious in style but it`s to twisted in the writing for me to enjoy such a book.

Tuprinu savu svēto misiju: graut vecos pieminekļus, lai to vietā uzstādītu jaunus. Grupas "Foo Fighters" trešais studijas albūms ir viens no šādiem pieminekļiem, kuru laiks ir garām.

Kas var būt labāk kā divās dienās noskatīties veselu viena seriāla sezonu? Patiesībā es varētu nosaukt diezgan daudz ko, kas būtu labāk par to. Iestigšana ar mašīnu netālu no Āraišu vējdzirnavām mālaina ceļa malā gan laikam šajā labāko lietu sarakstā neietilpst, tāpēc šeit par to nestāstīšu.

Would you believe that Paul McCartney is over sixty? It ain`t far till the day when he won`t be allowed to sing "When I`m 64" anymore and will have to change it to "When I`m not 64" - there was a Latvian song titled "When I won`t be 16 anymore", which by the way was a crappy song and has nothing to do with Paul`s new album. Is it right that I call him just Paul? Or do people get punished for not calling Him `Sir Paul McCartney` on the Internet? Anyhow, he`s got a new album out. It starts off with the energetic "It`s a fine line" which somehow reminds me of the Electric Light Orchestra and that song "It`s a living thing/It`s a given thing". After on Paul more relies on doing sad ballads which doesn`t come off as a real surprise. "Jenny Wren" is an accoustic song that could have been a Beatles demo record, where it not sung by a 60 year old man. "Friends to Go" is also a Beatles songs, circa from 1965. "English Tea" sounds to be a later Beatles composition, more in the style of "Maxwell`s Silver Hammer". "Certain Softness" is good. I also like "Promise to you girl" which is one of the most rocking tracks on the album. The one thing that bugs me is that at his not so young age Paul still writes mostly love songs. Jesus, he can`t be thinking seriously that people will believe in his sincerity. His lyrical capacity doesn`t seem to be much stronger that in 1964, but he ain`t a good looking young fellow no more. Hey, I don`t really think that he was that good looking back then. I`d put George in the first place, then John and Paul was only better looking that Ringo, but even that not always.

Nu, lūk, jūsu uzmanībai tipisks neuzmanības gadījums (hmm... divreiz atkārtoju vienu vārdu): noskatījāmies pie NR filmas "Zodiac" reklāmas rullīti un tad, skatoties pašu filmu, nevarējām nekādi saprast, kad mums beidzot rādīs reklāmā redzētos kadrus. Bet tie nekādi neparādījās (tā kā iekš otrajiem Klerkiem tā arī neparādījās neķītrā Kellija, kurai vajadzēja rotaļāties ar ēzeli). Tomēr filma it kā bija riktīgā - vismaz tā bija par leģendāro zodiaka slepkavu, kas terorizēja Amerikas dienvidus sešdesmito beigās un septiņdesmito sākumā.

Dīvaini paliek, padomojāt, ko šī grupa ir izaugusi no tās blices, kas saucās "Manfred Mann" un kuras lielākais grāvējais saucās "Doo wah diddy". Nē, "Manfreda Manna Zemes banda" nav 60-to gadu burbuļpopa grupa, bet gan septiņdesmito gadu džezroka-progroka apvienība, kurai šis laikam gan ir pazīstamākais albūms un tajā pilnīgi noteikti atrodas man vislabāk zināmā šīs apvienības kompozīcija - "Spirits in the Night" (kas gan patiesībā oriģināli bija Brūsa Springstīna dziesma, kuru nekad neesmu dzirdējis). "Spirits in the night" meldiņā ir jūtamas pavisam nelielas disko noskaņas, bet precīzāk to varētu nosaukt par kādu krustpunktu uz taisnes "King Crimson" - "Journey". Būtu vienkārši pieņemt, ka šāds ir viss albūms - balansējošs starp progroku un arēnas roku, katru reizi tuvojoties otrajam kļūstošs mazāk baudāms, pirmajam - vairāk. Tomēr te vairums kompozīciju ir instrumentāli gabali, kas nu nekādi nav atbilstošs elements arēnas rokam. Piemēram, "Countdown" ar īstenībā diezgan rokenrolīgo ģitāras melodiju, nekāds "Journey" neizpildītu. Problēma ir tāda, ka šie instrumentālie gabali lielākoties nav tik pārsteidzoši, lai liktu man (ievietot epitetu). Ja, piemēram, garas Pink Floyd vai King Crimson instrumentālas pasāžas mani piesaista, tad par Manfredu Mannu to tomēr teikt nevarēšu. Par vainu tam varētu būt šīs grupas sekundārums - mani kā klausītāju ne brīdi nepamet sajūta, ka "Nightingales&Bombers" ir B un nevis A līmeņa grupas albūms. Lai gan, piemēram, "Time is Right" man patīk pat ļoti labi, iespējams, ka labāk par "Spirit in the night", bet tas atkal nav nedz progroks, nedz džezroks, bet gan drīzāk blūzroks, kurā gan (tāpat kā visās šī albūma kompozīcijās) ir mazliet par daudz tehnisko triku salikts virsū - visādas dažādas futūristiskās skaņas man rada sajūtu, ka darīšana te ir nevis ar mūzikas albūmu, bet gan ar sešdesmito gadu zinātniskās fantastikas seriālu (līdz ar to "Crossfade", kur šādi stilīgie elementi ir gandrīz vai centrālā kompozīcijas daļa, mna patīk mazāk nekā "Countdown", kur tie ir tikai piedevas galvenajam ēdienam).

The Beatles play at the "Shea" stadium in the States. Overall their performance seems to have been quite a good one - and they don`t do only the popular numbers anymore, the recording quality certainly could have been much better, but it isn`t so there`s nothing that can be done about it. John goes a bit wild on there - stars playing the piano with his elbows and acting like he was crazy. Then the Beatles meet Elvis (although there`s no footage of that visit). But there`s one thing I didn`t know - that Elvis was actually supporting the idea of banning the Beatles in the States, so they wouldn`t spoil the american youth - and there even was an ugly photo of Elvis shaking Richard Nixon`s hand. "Norvegian Wood" introduces the sitar to popular music - that song isn`t performed live, but it`s still that big of a classic that I simply must mention it. The Beatles stop doing TV performances and start recording promo videos of their singles - as a matter of fact in this way they started the concept of music videos - cool. We reach "Rubber Soul" and "Revolver" - thus coming very close to the best (imho) period of their carreer. They go to Japan and it turns out that they don`t sound too good - because the audience isn`t that loud therefore their mistakes can be heard.

Most likely you won`t agree if somebody`ll tell you that "The Bloodhound Gang" is a genuinely intellectual band. And neither will I, although I must admit that they must be less stupid than their music premises it to be. They rock not to suck but to make you laugh. Frank Zappa already gave you the answer to the question whether humor belongs in music. But it`s not only good news. Musically the new round piece of plactic the bloodhounds have put out is purely bad. For instance, the opening "Balls out" is an endless repetition of the same note. It may be hard rockin` but it ain`t too good. The first single "F.U.C.K." contains more than ten different innuendo ways of saying "sex" and it somehow reminds the best cuts from their previous albums and is the only real highlight on the record. But overall it`s too much ear-bashing synthesizer sounds that don`t really work too well. "Ralph Wiggum" (the son of Springfield`s police chef Wiggum) is an okayish song but a bit boring. Without a doubt the most disturbing song on the record is the dance music piece "Uhn Tiss Uhn Tiss Uhn Tiss". If the melodies weren`t that lousy and unlistenable I`d probably call this a so-so record. But I won`t do it. Instead I`ll say it`s plain bad.

Esmu gatavs tikt nodēvēts par stagnējošu bezhumora perdeli, bet šajā filmā nebija nekā īpaša. Vismaz ne vairāk īpaša kā bija filmā "Jumanji".

Reti kuram mūsdienu literatūras darbam ir tik liela vēsturiskā nozīme kā Džeimsa Džoisa "Ulisam": tas kļuva par tik daudzu literatūras elementu pionieri, ka visu uzskaitīt laikam gan nav pat iespējams (it īpaši man, kas neesmu īpašs šīs tēmas eksperts). Grūti iedomāties literāru darbu, par kuru būtu uzrakstīts tik daudz pētījumu (vienīgās divas grāmatas, kas to šajā jomā noteikti pārspēj, ir Bībele un Šekspīra "Hamlets"). Grūti iedomāties grāmatu, kura ir tik prasīga pret lasītāju un kurā ir tik daudz elementu, kurus ierindas lasītājs nespēj uztvert (Umberto Eko, kā teikt, "can`t hold a candle" Džoisam). Ne velti standartā grāmatai līdzi nāk tāda apjoma komentāri, kas reizēm pārsniedz paša teksta apjomu (ievērojot to, ka arī romāns pats par sevi ir milzīgs). Un vienlaicīgi - grūti iedomāties grāmatu, kuras loma kā vēsturiskam darbam tik radikāli pārspēj tās pašas vērtību.